<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alvin Jimenez &#187; Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alvinjimenez.info/tag/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alvinjimenez.info</link>
	<description>Publishing &#38; Internet Marketing Professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:24:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Plurk will not survive the Social Networking Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.alvinjimenez.info/2010/04/05/why-plurk-will-not-survive-the-social-networking-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alvinjimenez.info/2010/04/05/why-plurk-will-not-survive-the-social-networking-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Micro-blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plurk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alvinjimenez.info/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plurk was very promising, more engaging than Twitter even. Sadly, my stint with Plurk has turned into nothing more than a social network novelty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alvinjimenez.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/plurk-logo.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-338  alignleft" style="border: 0pt none;" title="plurk-logo" src="http://www.alvinjimenez.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/plurk-logo.jpg" alt="plurk-logo" width="179" height="179" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I logged into my Plurk profile today and said to myself, looks like I&#8217;m going to have to let this go. In roughly a month, my &#8220;karma&#8221; has gone down from a high 92 to a measly 72. <strong>The sad thing about it, is that I really don&#8217;t care.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurk" target="_blank">Plurk</a> became popular at the workplace in 2008 primarily for planning the occasional dinner or night out. A simple &#8220;Drinks tonight?&#8221; Plurk can collect as many comments as necessary, right down to how many tables the group should be reserving. In other instances, I was able to reconnect with former colleagues, and at the same time unknowingly become updated with whatever else was happening. I&#8217;ve even used Plurk to determine who I should be working with. More presence on Plurk meant less time for actual work.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Personal experiences aside, those are not the reasons why I think Plurk will not survive the social networking wars.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-337"></span></p>
<ol style="text-align: left;">
<li><strong>Badge System</strong> &#8211; A quick inspection of Plurk&#8217;s badge system will reveal that a user can acquire a total of 30 badges. These range from X number of &#8220;Plurks&#8221;, right down to how long you have been a user of the service. The biggest flaw here is that there&#8217;s really no substantial incentive to acquire the badges in the first place.</li>
<li><strong>Notification system</strong> &#8211; As of this writing, I have a total of 6 badges on my profile, NONE OF WHICH I WAS AWARE OF. The Plurk team should have done a better job in taking care of user engagement.</li>
<li><strong>Karma System</strong> &#8211; I never reached 100 karma points on Plurk, but was there any reason to? Plurk&#8217;s karma system, which is based on &#8220;Plurks&#8221;, replies, or reply volume to any of your plurks, was never really enough incentive to keep your account going. I know a few people who have already quit using Plurk after achieving 100 karma points.</li>
<li><strong>User History</strong> &#8211; Browsing through your Plurk profile will prove to be frustrating at best. The timeline orientation, along with the different planes format of each individual Plurk, make it a frustrating experience.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: left;">The usual argument when letting a social network go, is usually, <em>&#8220;What does Social Network A have the Social Network B doesn&#8217;t?&#8221;</em> Or, <em>&#8220;Most of my friends and family are on Social Network A, so why should I give Social Network B a shot?&#8221;</em> It&#8217;s not about which social network was first, or <a href="http://nowsourcing.com/2010/03/17/social-media-infographic/" target="_blank">which social network is bigger</a>. It&#8217;s all about which social network was able to provide the most fulfilling user experience.</p>
<p>Plurk was very promising, more engaging than Twitter even. Sadly, my stint with Plurk has turned into nothing more than a social network novelty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alvinjimenez.info/2010/04/05/why-plurk-will-not-survive-the-social-networking-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twit for tat</title>
		<link>http://www.alvinjimenez.info/2009/04/21/twit-for-tat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alvinjimenez.info/2009/04/21/twit-for-tat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Micro-blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alvinjimenez.info/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the attention the micro-blogging tool has been getting the past few weeks, I'm actually on the brink of letting the the thing go. The novelty behind gaining a "follower" has started to lose its luster. You don't know if the person who added you wants to know what you think, or just added you in hopes of getting a reciprocated "follow".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-142" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="twit-for-tat" src="http://www.alvinjimenez.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/twit-for-tat-200x300.png" alt="twit-for-tat" width="200" height="300" />I&#8217;ve always scoffed at the idea of letting people know what you&#8217;re doing at every possible moment. People used to think texting was too much, but <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_messaging" target="_blank">look at us now</a>. I&#8217;m sure a lot of people would agree with me, that nowadays, a lot of us may have become wired a bit too much.  Did anyone say &#8212; Twitter? <a href="http://omg.yahoo.com/news/ashton-kutcher-becomes-first-twitter-member-to-net-1-million-followers/21414?nc" target="_blank">As if you didn&#8217;t know</a>.</p>
<p>With the attention the micro-blogging tool has been getting the past few weeks, I was actually on the brink of letting the the thing go. The novelty behind gaining a &#8220;follower&#8221; has started to lose its luster. You don&#8217;t know if the person who added you wants to know what you think, or just added you in hopes of getting a reciprocated &#8220;follow&#8221;.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I cannot let go of these micro-blogging platforms under my profile on the right. Not because I&#8217;m an Internet marketer (and is therefore bound by the unwritten rules of Internet Marketing), but because these tools are too valuable from a reputation building standpoint. How will I tell everyone who isn&#8217;t subscribed to my RSS feed that I just posted another blog post? How do I tell a bunch of people with no access to a computer what I&#8217;m thinking? A mass text to those people? That my friends is old school. As much as I admire <a href="http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/58615/20090417/barkley_tweeters_are_a_bunch_of_losers/" target="_blank">this guy right here</a>, I&#8217;m sorry to say he just has no idea what he&#8217;s talking about.</p>
<p><strong>I Twit or Plurk, or blog, so I can share what I know</strong> &#8212; also in hopes the few people who &#8220;follow&#8221; me can find value in what I have to say. I also follow others out there because I know I&#8217;m not the only one with something to share. For ordinary guys like me, it doesn&#8217;t matter how fast you can get to a million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alvinjimenez.info/2009/04/21/twit-for-tat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
